[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Ke8hd-0001TE-TN@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:28:49 +0200
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, multinymous@...il.com,
Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Laptop shock detection and harddisk protection
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> 1. How should the shock interface look like? As we're gonna need
> userland daemon one way or the other, we can use the userland
> daemon to glue all the interfaces but it would be much better to
> have a unified interface. Although there seem to be several
> different variants, they don't differ all that much and creating a
> new interface every time is painful. I think we can get by with a
> sysfs interface with notification.
It should provide a connection to the corresponding device. Imagine an USB
case having a sensor, being connected to a desktop system. You would want
to exactly protect the enclosed USB device, and possibly non-protected USB
devices, too, but not halt the internal disks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists