[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809121623.22644.brunel@diku.dk>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:23:22 +0200
From: Julien Brunel <brunel@...u.dk>
To: ericvh@...il.com, rminnich@...dia.gov, lucho@...kov.net,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs/9p: Use an IS_ERR test rather than a NULL test
From: Julien Brunel <brunel@...u.dk>
In case of error, the function p9_client_walk returns an ERR pointer,
but never returns a NULL pointer. So a NULL test that comes after an
IS_ERR test should be deleted.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@match_bad_null_test@
expression x, E;
statement S1,S2;
@@
x = p9_client_walk(...)
... when != x = E
* if (x != NULL)
S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julien Brunel <brunel@...u.dk>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -u -p a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -626,8 +626,7 @@ static struct dentry *v9fs_vfs_lookup(st
return NULL;
error:
- if (fid)
- p9_client_clunk(fid);
+ p9_client_clunk(fid);
return ERR_PTR(result);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists