[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48CA9059.1020209@nortel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:52:57 -0600
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To: ego@...ibm.com
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix __load_balance_iterator() for cfq with only
one task
Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> sched: Fix __load_balance_iterator() for cfq with only one task.
>
> From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
>
> The __load_balance_iterator() returns a NULL when there's only one
> sched_entity which is a task. It is caused by the following code-path.
>
>
> /* Skip over entities that are not tasks */
> do {
> se = list_entry(next, struct sched_entity, group_node);
> next = next->next;
> } while (next != &cfs_rq->tasks && !entity_is_task(se));
>
> if (next == &cfs_rq->tasks)
> return NULL;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This will return NULL even when se is a task.
Thank you! I'd been looking suspiciously at this routine as well due to
strange load-balancing behaviour that I saw while testing the fair group
code, but I hadn't yet tracked down the exact problem.
Peter/Ingo, this appears to explain the issues described in the mail I
sent on the 4th. After applying this change the imbalance between tasks
in the same group is substantially reduced.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists