[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22453.1221243065@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:11:05 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] libata: Implement disk shock protection support
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:15:22 +0200, Elias Oltmanns said:
> Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> > How about returning -OVERFLOW while still setting the timeout to the
> > maximum?
>
> Yes, that makes sense. I'll take care to document it that way:
> -EINVAL for values < -2, -EOVERFLOW for values > 30000.
Works for me...
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists