[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6934efce0809121317r418c80e8s4755669cc74975c4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:17:28 -0700
From: "Jared Hulbert" <jaredeh@...il.com>
To: "Jamie Lokier" <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: "Greg Ungerer" <gerg@...pgear.com>, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@...fs.org>,
tim.bird@...sony.com, cotte@...ibm.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem
> I think the "fast" in "fast synchronous" gives it away :-)
Yes, I suppose it does.
> I'm using Spansion MirrorBit S29GL128N, which reads at about 0.6 MByte/s.
I think you should get more like an order of magnitude higher.... Get
an expert to look at your timings in the bootloader. Make sure things
are cached too. ioremap_cached()...
> Not because they're good, but because that's what the board I'm coding
> for has on it. I presume they were cheap and familiar to the board
> designers. (There is 32MB of RAM to play with after all.)
>
> So start a sequence of Busybox processes from a shell script is noticable,
> if it reads from NOR each time.
>
> Oh, and it's a 166MHz ARM, so it's quite capable of decompressing
> faster than the NOR can deliver.
Depends on how you are measuring it. You ought to be able to get at
least 2 orders of magnitude higher read speeds with a good sync Flash.
Some of the newer stuff is even faster.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists