[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6c5339f0809121327k5fd6c980le0ec5d46be089af2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:27:54 -0400
From: "Bob Copeland" <me@...copeland.com>
To: "Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski" <herton@...driva.com.br>
Cc: "Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
bogdano@...driva.com.br,
"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@...driva.com.br>,
"Abdel Benamrouche" <draconux@...il.com>,
"Damien Lallement" <dlallement@...driva.com>,
"pterjan@...driva.com" <pterjan@...driva.com>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
<herton@...driva.com.br> wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/partitions/check.c b/fs/partitions/check.c
> index 7d6b34e..15c70df 100644
> --- a/fs/partitions/check.c
> +++ b/fs/partitions/check.c
> @@ -499,9 +499,9 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev)
> if (!size)
> continue;
> if (from + size > get_capacity(disk)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR " %s: p%d exceeds device capacity\n",
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + " %s: p%d exceeds device capacity\n",
> disk->disk_name, p);
> - continue;
It might make sense to comment here that we intentionally want to add the
partition anyway. That might keep someone from re-adding the continue (same
patch has already come up at least 3 times).
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists