[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080912082301.GA28385@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:23:01 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, utrace-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:57:33PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> 3. arch_ptrace()
>
> * You must define arch_ptrace() and not #define __ARCH_SYS_PTRACE.
__ARCH_SYS_PTRACE is already gone :)
>
> 4. compat_arch_ptrace()
>
> * If your arch uses CONFIG_COMPAT, you must define
> compat_arch_ptrace() and #define __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_PTRACE.
This should be gone for 2.6.28, too. (no ACK from the ia64 people yet,
but mips and parisc are doen for sure)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists