[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080912094955.GB14201@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:49:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: use early_ioremap in __acpi_map_table
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > void __iomem *__init_refok
> > acpi_os_map_memory(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
> > {
> > if (phys > ULONG_MAX) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Cannot map memory that high\n");
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > if (acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap)
> > /*
> > * ioremap checks to ensure this is in reserved space
> > */
> > return ioremap((unsigned long)phys, size);
> > else
> > return __acpi_map_table((unsigned long)phys, size);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_os_map_memory);
> >
> > void acpi_os_unmap_memory(void __iomem * virt, acpi_size size)
> > {
> > if (acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap) {
> > iounmap(virt);
> > }
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_os_unmap_memory);
> >
> > just let acpi_os_unmap_memory to call __acpi_unmap_table...
> >
>
> That was my first attempt. Unfortunately a lot of the acpi code seems
> pretty sloppy about unmapping its tables, and basically relies on
> __acpi_map_table's current behaviour of removing the previous mapping
> when creating the new mapping.
could we just emit a WARN_ON_ONCE() warning when we have to remove a
previous mapping, so that the ACPI code can be fixed eventually?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists