[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gagno4$pp9$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:54:44 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in
2.6.27
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:56:49 -0300
> Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@...driva.com.br> wrote:
>
>> Recently I found a problem with a buggy camera that doesn't mount anymore with
>> 2.6.27 (its memory is available via usb-storage), since commit
>> 04ebd4aee52b06a2c38127d9208546e5b96f3a19
>>
>> The camera is an Olympus X-840. The original issue comes from the camera
>> itself: its format program creates a partition with an off by one error,
>> while the device reports that its memory has 42079 sectors, the partition
>> table reports also that the only partition on the disk has the size of 42079,
>> but it fails to account for the first sector in the memory that contains the
>> partition table, so in the end the partition exceeds the limit of the device
>> size (42080, first sector plus 42079 from the first partition).
>>
>> In previous kernels (2.6.26 and before), I still could mount and access the
>> device (/dev/sdb1), although with the following errors:
>
> Yeah.
>
> Can you test this please?
>
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>
> Herton Krzesinski reports that the error-checking changes in
> 04ebd4aee52b06a2c38127d9208546e5b96f3a19 ("block/ioctl.c and
> fs/partition/check.c: check value returned by add_partition") cause his
> buggy USB camera to no longer mount. "The camera is an Olympus X-840.
> The original issue comes from the camera itself: its format program
> creates a partition with an off by one error".
>
> Buggy devices happen. It is better for the kernel to warn and to proceed
> with the mount.
>
> Reported-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@...driva.com.br>
> Cc: Abdel Benamrouche <draconux@...il.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> fs/partitions/check.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -puN fs/partitions/check.c~rescan_partitions-make-device-capacity-errors-non-fatal fs/partitions/check.c
> --- a/fs/partitions/check.c~rescan_partitions-make-device-capacity-errors-non-fatal
> +++ a/fs/partitions/check.c
> @@ -540,7 +540,6 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *di
> if (from + size > get_capacity(disk)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR " %s: p%d exceeds device capacity\n",
> disk->disk_name, p);
> - continue;
> }
> res = add_partition(disk, p, from, size, state->parts[p].flags);
> if (res) {
> _
>
I really like the patch Herton posted, with the big comment on why you don't
want continue, to avoid repeating this conversation in a few years.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists