[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5habecm03s.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:23:03 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #11398] hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
At Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:37:51 +0200,
Frans Pop wrote:
>
> On Friday 12 September 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > know (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11398
> > Subject : hda_intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0.
> > Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
>
> Still there.
Yeah, the driver wasn't changed about this.
Basically it's a warning message that CPU usage got higher due to
somehow wrongly behaving hardware. The driver behavior itself didn't
do anything wrong. That is, if the driver didn't show it, you
wouldn't have noticed any change (or noticed improvements in some apps
:)
Of course, it would be ideal if we can add a perfect workaround for
it, but right now, I have no idea what to do better. So, I don't
think it's worth to keeping this open as a regression.
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists