linux-kernel - Re: Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0809122222120.16077-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date:	Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:22:54 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@...driva.com.br>,
	<me@...copeland.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <bogdano@...driva.com.br>,
	<lcapitulino@...driva.com.br>, <draconux@...il.com>,
	<dlallement@...driva.com>, <pterjan@...driva.com>,
	<axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in
 2.6.27

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, David Brownell wrote:

> On Friday 12 September 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >                         printk(KERN_ERR " %s: p%d exceeds device capacity\n",
> >                                 disk->disk_name, p);
> > -                       continue;
> >                 }
> 
> So that now deserves to be KERN_WARN not KERN_ERR, yes?

In addition it deserves to be commented so that somebody doesn't go and 
change it yet again.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/