[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809121659.21743.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:59:20 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: herton@...driva.com.br, me@...copeland.com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, bogdano@...driva.com.br,
lcapitulino@...driva.com.br, draconux@...il.com,
dlallement@...driva.com, pterjan@...driva.com, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Partition check considered as error is breaking mounting in 2.6.27
> > > ________________________________________________________________disk->disk_name, p);
> > > -______________________________________________continue;
> > > ________________________________}
>
> wtf-your-email-client-is-insane.
I have no idea where that came from. Wasn't in the original or
in my copy.
> > So that now deserves to be KERN_WARN not KERN_ERR, yes?
>
> spose so.
>
> I'm fairly unenthused about the recent KERN_correctness fad since it
> went and broke sysrq-T output (you have to set the loglevel beforehand
> to avoid getting only partial output).
On development systems I generally "echo 8 > /proc/sysrq*"
to make sure KERN_DEBUG isn't hidden.
In this case it's just that I saw flamage a few minutes
earlier from someone trying to keep a distro boot from
spewing scarey messages for things that were NOT errors.
Like ... this message. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists