lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080914152947.GH29290@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:29:47 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] x86, cpa: cpa related changes to be inline with
	TLB Application note


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:

> TLB Application note[1] says:
> 	
> "The TLBs may contain both ordinary and large-page translations for a 4-KByte
>  range of linear addresses. This may occur if software modifies the paging
>  structures so that the page size used for the address range changes. If the
>  two translations differ with respect to page frame or attributes (e.g.,
>  permissions), processor behavior is undefined and may be implementation 
>  specific. The processor may use a page frame or attributes that correspond to
>  neither translation; it may improperly set or fail to set the dirty bit in the
>  appropriate paging-structure entry.
>  
>  Such undefined behavior is problematic because prefetches and memory accesses
>  that are a result of speculative execution may occur, using the affected range
>  of linear addresses. It is also problematic if software (including the software
>  modifying the paging structures) is accessing data or executing code in the
>  affected range of linear addresses. Software should not write to a
>  paging-structure entry in a way that would change, for any linear address,
>  both the page size and either the page frame or attributes."
> 
> Currently we violate this at:
> 
> a. kernel identity mapping, where large/small pages setup very early in the
>    boot will be split up/merged into large pages along with attribute changes
>    during the direct memory mapping init.
> 
> b. while doing cpa(), potentially we will split large page and change attribute
>    both at the same time.
> 
> Following patches fixes this behavior.
> 
> [1] http://developer.intel.com/design/processor/applnots/317080.pdf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>

applied to tip/x86/pat, thanks Suresh.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ