[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080914154825.GA13513@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:48:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alan Mayer <ajm@....com>, jeremy@...p.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.lu@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system vectors
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > There are two kernel modules, sgi-gru and sgi-xp (in drivers/misc),
> > that each need two vectors. And there's the broadcast assist unit
> > (BAU) that is involved in tlb shootdown on uv, which currently uses
> > statically reserved vector 0xf8 (UV_BAU_MESSAGE -- see
> > uv_bau_init()).
>
> while i understand the UV_BAU_MESSAGE case (TLB flushes are special),
> why does sgi-gru and sgi-xp need to go that deep? They are drivers,
> they should be able to make use of an ordinary irq just like the other
> 2000 drivers we have do.
... but all in one, i still like this concept as it's a nice clean-up. I
just dont think it should be exposed to generic drivers, and i think it
needs further fixes and cleanups. (see my previous mails)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists