[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080914221231.GG27080@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:12:31 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mpm@...enic.com
Subject: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:06:31AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > [ 6460.634452]
> > > [ 6460.634465] =======================================================
> > > [ 6460.634494] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > > [ 6460.634517] 2.6.27-rc6-tip-00290-g8e229c3-dirty #1
> > > [ 6460.634535] -------------------------------------------------------
> > > [ 6460.634555] gdm-simple-gree/4778 is trying to acquire lock:
> > > [ 6460.634574] (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<c018fe33>] might_fault+0x36/0x73
> > > [ 6460.634639]
> > > [ 6460.634645] but task is already holding lock:
> > > [ 6460.634662] (&dev->ev_mutex){--..}, at: [<c01c7a76>] inotify_read+0xd8/0x16e
> > > [ 6460.634715]
> > > [ 6460.634721] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> >
> > Yes, there's a thread in my intray called "inotify_read's ev_mutex vs
> > do_page_fault's mmap_sem...". It's a bit flakey-looking, but there's
> > a patch in there.
>
> ah, thx. I picked up the patch into tip/out-of-tree. (see below for a
> tided up changelog) Please queue it up as v2.6.27 material. (i'll report
> it if anything breaks due to the patch)
>
> Ingo
>
> --------------->
> >From 1eb0a42e4eb3283521ee1de99adbf567874b622f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 06:12:51 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: fix locking, inotify_read's ev_mutex vs do_page_fault's mmap_sem...
I would call this "fs: fix inotify locking....", it's not really an mm bug
if another subsystem misuses mm's APIs. But that's a nitpick.
Here is the other patch I did too.
tiny-shmem calls do_truncate in shmem_file_setup. do_truncate takes i_mutex,
and shmem_file_setup is called with mmap_sem held. However i_mutex nests
outside mmap_sem.
Copy the code in shmem.c to avoid this problem.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
---
Index: linux-2.6/mm/tiny-shmem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/tiny-shmem.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/tiny-shmem.c
@@ -65,31 +65,25 @@ struct file *shmem_file_setup(char *name
if (!dentry)
goto put_memory;
+ error = -ENFILE;
+ file = get_empty_filp();
+ if (!file)
+ goto put_dentry;
+
error = -ENOSPC;
inode = ramfs_get_inode(root->d_sb, S_IFREG | S_IRWXUGO, 0);
if (!inode)
- goto put_dentry;
-
- d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
- error = -ENFILE;
- file = alloc_file(shm_mnt, dentry, FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_READ,
- &ramfs_file_operations);
- if (!file)
- goto put_dentry;
-
- inode->i_nlink = 0; /* It is unlinked */
-
- /* notify everyone as to the change of file size */
- error = do_truncate(dentry, size, 0, file);
- if (error < 0)
goto close_file;
+ d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
+ inode->i_size = size;
+ inode->i_nlink = 0; /* It is unlinked */
+ init_file(file, shm_mnt, dentry, FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_READ,
+ &ramfs_file_operations);
return file;
close_file:
put_filp(file);
- return ERR_PTR(error);
-
put_dentry:
dput(dentry);
put_memory:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists