linux-kernel - Re: frustrating ath9k issues in 2.6.27-rc6-00036-ga551b98 (Linus pristine tree)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0809141800360.7280@alcarin.uplinklabs.net>
Date:	Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: frustrating ath9k issues in 2.6.27-rc6-00036-ga551b98 (Linus
 pristine tree)

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Saturday, 13 of September 2008, Steven Noonan wrote:
> > I just had another incident where it disassociated and refused to
> > reassociate. I got about 100 of these in my dmesg (fixed by unloading
> > and reloading ath9k):
> 
> Is this a regression from 2.6.26?
> 

ath9k has been recently introduced (i.e. it's new to 2.6.27). So I'm not 
certain how to answer. Correct me if I'm wrong but a regression is a new  
bug for a specific component that did not surface in the previous release, 
correct? But if the component didn't exist in the previous version, is it 
still a regression?

- Steven
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/