[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080915224707.76b2cca0@daedalus.pq.iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:47:07 +0300
From: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Tracing/ftrace: trouble with trace_entries and trace_pipe
Hi Steven and others,
first a minor bug: it seems the units of /debug/tracing/trace_entries
is different for read and write. This is confusing for the users, since
I can't say "if you have problems, double it". If I read from it
something like 16422, then write back 16422, next I read 214. I can't
recall the exact numbers, but the difference really is two orders of
magnitude. I have 1 GB RAM in this box, so that shouldn't be an issue.
My other problem is with trace_pipe. It is again making 'cat' quit too
early. The condition triggered is
if (!tracer_enabled && iter->pos) {
in tracing_read_pipe(), and it is followed by triggering
/* stop when tracing is finished */
if (trace_empty(iter)) {
and then sret=0, so read returns 0 and 'cat' exits.
Now, I am trying my mmiotrace marker patches, but as far as I can tell,
nothing I modified is the reason for this. I didn't yet explicitly test
for it, though. I'll send these patches after I hear from Frederic.
The cat-quit problem is not a constant state. After boot, I could play
with my markers and testmmiotrace without cat quitting. Then something
happens, and cat starts the quitting behaviour, and won't get to normal
by disabling and enabling mmiotrace.
I have a couple of wild guesses of what might be related:
- ring buffer wrap-around
- ring buffer overflow (at first try I hit these, the second try
after putting debug-pr_info's in place I don't hit this)
- ring buffer resize (after playing with trace_entries, cat-quit
problem was present, though it might have been present before)
After viewing the git history, I have some more guesses, mainly
related to setting tracer_enabled to 0.
- commit 2b1bce1787700768cbc87c8509851c6f49d252dc
I don't see where tracer_enabled would be set to 1, when
mmiotrace is enabled. It used to default to 1 and mmiotrace was happy.
- __tracing_open() sets it to 0 (not called for the pipe)
- tracing_release() sets it to 1
- tracing_ctrl_write() toggles it
- tracing_read_pipe() tests it
- tracer_alloc_buffers() uses it
And other tracers seem to use it a lot.
Mmiotrace does use the tracer::ctrl_update hook, and allow/disallow
calls to __trace_mmiotrace_{rw,map}() via enabling/disabling the whole
mmiotrace core. Is this not enough, or is it inappropriate?
It seems tracer_enabled is used by the trace framework itself to
enable/disable... what? Hmm, maybe nothing I care about.
Should mmiotrace simply do
tracer_enabled = 1;
in mmio_trace_init()?
Should mmiotrace test tracer_enabled, and if so, when?
Thanks.
--
Pekka Paalanen
http://www.iki.fi/pq/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists