linux-kernel - Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080915.132716.267218808.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jeff@...zik.org
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:17:50 -0400

> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:09:17PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> > Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:35:48 -0400
> > 
> > > Includes several fixes from my slice of the akpm patch pie.
> > 
> > Which of these have regression and/or bugzilla entries?
> > 
> > This is too much and I want to see it trimmed down.
> 
> What do you not want?  The two warning fixes (mlx4, cs89x0) akpm seemed
> to want in 2.6.27, the 8139too change is cosmetic.  The other stuff is
> critical AFAICS.

I'll take another look at the queue and try to give you some
more specific feedback.

I can think of about 3 or 4 entries on the posted regression
list that might be appropriate, so I essentially expected to
see that many commits, give or take one or two.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/