[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080917021319O.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:13:25 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: andi@...stfloor.org
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, mingo@...e.hu, joerg.roedel@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix GART to respect device's dma_mask about
virtual mappings
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:43:35 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > What the need_iommu() does is seeing if GART needs to do virtual
> > mappings or not.
> >
> > (After need_iommu() checking) What this patchset does is to guarantee
> > that GART provides a virtual address that a device can access to.
>
> Ah you care about masks < 32bit?
Yes,
> Those always are handled elsewhere in the block layer (using the bounce_pfn
> mechanism)
I don't think that the bounce guarantees that dma_alloc_coherent()
returns an address that a device can access to.
> or in various other ways in other subsystems. e.g. on networking
> the rule is that you just don't announce direct SG when you have
> less than 32bit mask.
I'm not familiar with what the networking does, for example, seems
that b44 sets dev->dma_mask to DMA_30BIT_MASK and b44_start_xmit()
does:
mapping = ssb_dma_map_single(bp->sdev, skb->data, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
if (ssb_dma_mapping_error(bp->sdev, mapping) || mapping + len > DMA_30BIT_MASK) {
struct sk_buff *bounce_skb;
/* Chip can't handle DMA to/from >1GB, use bounce buffer */
if (!ssb_dma_mapping_error(bp->sdev, mapping))
ssb_dma_unmap_single(bp->sdev, mapping, len,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
IOMMUs can try to return an address that the NIC can access to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists