[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809161348.24130.linux@sandersweb.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:48:23 -0400
From: David Sanders <linux@...dersweb.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't use NOPL on 32-bit cpu's because not all systems support it.
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 12:32, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Oh good grief.
>
> VPC is apparently so broken that these instructions work *some* of the
> time, which may include the first time, but not later. That is an
> impressive level of cockup.
>
> Given that, we should either just rip this code out, or detect VPC
> (how?). The latter option can be done post-.27, of course; if so, we
> should just force the bit off for now rather than doing it in the
> alternatives code. The only reason for doing the latter at all would be
> to mitigate the overhead of paravirt_ops and other dynamic patch sites.
>
> It would also be the least impact for .27, I believe.
I think you still want the nopl enabled for 64-bits.
This is how I detect virtual pc. I based it on a google search. Microsoft
itself provides no info:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void except(int e)
{
printf("Not in Virtual PC\n");
exit(1);
}
int main()
{
signal(SIGILL, except);
asm("\n"
"mov $0x01, %eax\n" /* function number */
".byte 0x0f, 0x3f, 0x07, 0x0b\n" /* call VPC */
);
printf("Inside Virtual PC\n");
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists