[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48CFF281.7010101@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:53:05 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbaron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce boot_printk()
Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> it seem using pci_printk or acpi_printk.. could be more flexible.
>
> otherwise will need to keep update linux/kernel.h to add so call subsys tags...
>
> use only need to
> have DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP(xxx) in c
> and have DECLARE_LOGLEVEL(xxx) in .h
> then just use xxx_printk
>
Uh? You can add the subsys tags elsewhere if you prefer too.
However, there are a few important differences to keep in mind. Tags
get logged in the dmesg buffer even if not printed to the kernel,
whereas a jump-based architecture will not just suppress the output, but
even the formatting of the output. Either is a good thing for certain
things, and a bad thing for other things.
I personally think the kind of things discussed belong in the category
of "always put in the dmesg buffer", and like the idea of
subsystem-tagging them.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists