[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D0310E.1040409@am.sony.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:19:58 -0700
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/3] fastboot: sync the async execution before late_initcall
and move level 6s (sync) first
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:29:21PM +0100, Simon Arlott wrote:
>>>> There is nothing else to run between 1-2 and 3, so there is no
>>>> opportunity
>>>> to initialise devices in the background and usblp_init blocks for a
>>>> while.
>>> If it were a module then it would block in a separate thread and wouldn't
>>> hold up the main init process.
>> Right, but I want to compile all of this into the kernel.
>
> Why? It sounds like a trivial solution for you is to actually use
> modules. Why go through a lot of extra work to solve something in a
> different way that is already solved for you?
>
> Who is imposing the "no modules allowed" rule on you, and why was it
> made?
Sorry for the massively late response.
Don't know how I missed this thread earlier, but I can answer that
from my standpoint.
At Sony we have a "no modules if possible" policy to reduce kernel
footprint. The size difference for a kernel compiled with modules
vs one with external modules is about 10% IRRC.
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists