[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080916084143.GC17287@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:41:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.27-rc5 resubmit] Fix itimer/many thread hang.
* Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com> wrote:
> > the wider question is, shouldnt the UP case be just the same as the
> > SMP case? Especially the type assymetry struct thread_group_cputime
> > looks ugly. (and assymetries like that tend to be a constant source
> > of breakage like the one below.)
>
> I'm not overly fond of this one, either; I did it at Roland's
> suggestion (it's all _his_ fault, yeah, _that's_ the ticket! :-); his
> opinion IIRC was that the UP case will perform better without the
> extra pointer dereferences. I agree that it's a potential source of
> pain such as the one you point out.
i dont know ...
lets try that simplification as a delta patch, ok? Please check the
before/after size of 'vmlinux' in a 'make defconfig' [with SMP disabled
after make defconfig] UP build. If there's visible size difference then
Roland's point holds.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists