[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48CF7C85.1070309@coritel.it>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:29:41 +0200
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...itel.it>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: added better file aio_read aio_write operations presence
check
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
If a filesystem in the file operations specifies for read and write operations only do_sync_read and do_sync_write without
init aio_read and aio_write, there will be a kernel oops, because the vfs code check the presence of (to read for example)
read OR aio_read method, then it calls read if it's pointer is not null. It's not sufficient because if the read function is
actually a do_sync_read, it calls aio_read but without checking the presence. I think a BUG_ON check can be more useful.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
---
--- linux-2.6.26.5/fs/read_write.c.orig 2008-08-20 20:11:37.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.26.5/fs/read_write.c 2008-09-16 11:01:13.000000000 +0200
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ ssize_t do_sync_read(struct file *filp,
kiocb.ki_pos = *ppos;
kiocb.ki_left = len;
+ BUG_ON(!filp->f_op->aio_read);
for (;;) {
ret = filp->f_op->aio_read(&kiocb, &iov, 1, kiocb.ki_pos);
if (ret != -EIOCBRETRY)
@@ -295,6 +296,7 @@ ssize_t do_sync_write(struct file *filp,
kiocb.ki_pos = *ppos;
kiocb.ki_left = len;
+ BUG_ON(!filp->f_op->aio_write);
for (;;) {
ret = filp->f_op->aio_write(&kiocb, &iov, 1, kiocb.ki_pos);
if (ret != -EIOCBRETRY)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists