[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080917100422.GC4984@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:04:23 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, klibc@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/inotify.h: do not include <linux/fcntl.h> in
userspace
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:32:40PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:10:25AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > >> What is the error message?
> > > >
> > > > /usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:117: error: redefinition of 'struct
> > > > flock'
> > >
> > > And? None of these programs should use <linux/inotify.h>. There has
> > > for the longest time been a <sys/inotify.h> header which doesn't need
> > > any kernel headers. In fact, <linux/inotify.h> should not be exported.
> >
> > Even if userspace applications shouldn't use it directly this doesn't
> > sound right:
> >
> > We shouldn't force all libc implementations to copy the contents into a
> > private header.
>
> glibc and dietlibc provide <sys/inotify.h>. newlib and uclibc don't. klibc
> provides <sys/inotify.h> but it depends on <linux/inotify.h>
Oh.. Sorry. uclibc provides <sys/inotify.h>.
So unexporting <linux/inotify.h> breaks only klibc.
--
Regards, Kirill A. Shutemov
+ Belarus, Minsk
+ ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists