[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440809170930m21f09879q3aa4edf2a32879f6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:30:32 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Frans Pop" <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86: add KERN_APIC
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>>>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "APIC calibration not consistent "
>>>> + printk(KERN_WARNING KERN_APIC "APIC calibration not
>>>> consistent "
>>>
>>> here too the question arises: what should the semantics of the 'mixing'
>>> of such subsystem printk tags with the classic priority tags be. I
>>> think in this particular case we dont want the KERN_APIC tag, as that
>>> would prevent this failure message to be printed by default. I.e. this
>>> line should remain:
>>>
>>>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "APIC calibration not consistent "
>>>
>>> to make sure this warning always shows up in the logs. Agreed?
>>
>> with
>> DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP_DEF(apic, KERN_APIC, "apic:", 6);
>> the KERN_WARNING <5> will be showing up that warning, even without
>> loglevl=apic:8
>>
>> or change that to
>> DEFINE_LOGLEVEL_SETUP_DEF(apic, KERN_APIC, "apic:", 7);
>
> Are you suggesting that each subsystem define its own default log level?
> That sounds truly horrible. It would mean that when reading code or
> adding new messages you'd always have to check what the default loglevel
> is for a particular subsystem.
could be done.
SPEW: 8
???:9
current msg_loglevel is limted to one digital
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists