[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D15EAD.1030804@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:46:53 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Zev Weiss <zevweiss@...il.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [MTD] physmap.c: Check return of platform_device_register()
I just wrote:
>>> The PHYSMAP_COMPAT code had been ignoring the return value of
>>> platform_device_register() in the physmap_init() function.
>>> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zevweiss@...il.com>
> [...]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c
>>> index 42d844f..6fba0d4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/physmap.c
>>> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __init physmap_init(void)
>>> err = platform_driver_register(&physmap_flash_driver);
>>> #ifdef PHYSMAP_COMPAT
>>> if (err == 0)
>>> - platform_device_register(&physmap_flash);
>>> + err = platform_device_register(&physmap_flash);
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> return err;
[...]
>> Presumably we should run platform_driver_unregister() if the
>> platform_device_register() failed.
> Why is that? There could be "normal" platform devices out there...
With that said, the patch is pointless (as already noted by Lennert).
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists