[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D17E75.80807@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:02:29 -0700
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Hugh Dickens <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Populating multiple ptes at fault time
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Minor faults are easier; if the page already exists in memory, we should
> just create mappings to it. If neighbouring pages are also already
> present, then we can can cheaply create mappings for them too.
>
>
One problem is the accessed bit. If it's unset, the shadow code cannot
make the pte present (since it has to trap in order to set the accessed
bit); if it's set, we're lying to the vm.
This doesn't affect Xen, only kvm.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists