linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080917.152313.173231111.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	paul.moore@...com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jmorris@...ei.org,
	rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #11500] /proc/net bug related to selinux

From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:24:36 -0400

> If that is the case I'm not sure it is really that big of a deal.  Maybe 
> I'm in the minority here, but in my mind once you step away from the 
> distro supplied kernel (also applies to other packages, although those 
> are arguably less critical) you should also bear the responsibility to 
> make sure you upgrade/tweak/install whatever other bits need to be 
> fixed.

No, we tend to call this breaking things instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/