[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080919005651C.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:57:36 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: joerg.roedel@....com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/23] AMD IOMMU: simplify dma_mask_to_pages
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:32:32 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 04:20:20AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:52:52 +0200
> > Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> >
> > > The current calculation is very complicated. This patch replaces it with
> > > a much simpler version.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > I think that you can use iommu_device_max_index() for what
> > dma_mask_to_pages does.
>
> Hmm, in theory yes. But iommu_device_max_index() returns a size in bytes
> and not in pages.
It doesn't return a size in bytes. You could use like:
limit = iommu_device_max_index(dom->aperture_size >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0,
dma_get_mask(dev) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
Anyway, it's not urgent at all. I'll send a patch for this after your
patchset is merged.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists