[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D29485.5010900@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:48:53 +0200
From: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -mm] memrlimit: fix task_lock() recursive locking
cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks() can be called with task_lock() held in
mm_update_next_owner(), and all the .mm_owner_changed callbacks seem to
be *always* called with task_lock() held.
Actually, memrlimit is using task_lock() via get_task_mm() in
memrlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed(), raising the following recursive locking
trace:
[ 5346.421365] =============================================
[ 5346.421374] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 5346.421381] 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 #20
[ 5346.421385] ---------------------------------------------
[ 5346.421391] interbench/10530 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 5346.421396] (&p->alloc_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8023b034>] get_task_mm+0x24/0x70
[ 5346.421417]
[ 5346.421418] but task is already holding lock:
[ 5346.421423] (&p->alloc_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8023db98>] mm_update_next_owner+0x148/0x230
[ 5346.421438]
[ 5346.421440] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 5346.421446] 2 locks held by interbench/10530:
[ 5346.421450] #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<ffffffff8023db90>] mm_update_next_owner+0x140/0x230
[ 5346.421467] #1: (&p->alloc_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8023db98>] mm_update_next_owner+0x148/0x230
[ 5346.421483]
[ 5346.421485] stack backtrace:
[ 5346.421491] Pid: 10530, comm: interbench Not tainted 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 #20
[ 5346.421496] Call Trace:
[ 5346.421507] [<ffffffff80263383>] validate_chain+0xb03/0x10d0
[ 5346.421515] [<ffffffff80263c05>] __lock_acquire+0x2b5/0x9c0
[ 5346.421522] [<ffffffff80262cc2>] validate_chain+0x442/0x10d0
[ 5346.421530] [<ffffffff802643aa>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xe0
[ 5346.421537] [<ffffffff8023b034>] get_task_mm+0x24/0x70
[ 5346.421546] [<ffffffff804757c7>] _spin_lock+0x37/0x70
[ 5346.421553] [<ffffffff8023b034>] get_task_mm+0x24/0x70
[ 5346.421560] [<ffffffff8023b034>] get_task_mm+0x24/0x70
[ 5346.421569] [<ffffffff802b91f8>] memrlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed+0x18/0x90
[ 5346.421579] [<ffffffff80278b03>] cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks+0x93/0xc0
[ 5346.421587] [<ffffffff8023dc36>] mm_update_next_owner+0x1e6/0x230
[ 5346.421595] [<ffffffff8023dd72>] exit_mm+0xf2/0x120
[ 5346.421602] [<ffffffff8023f547>] do_exit+0x167/0x930
[ 5346.421610] [<ffffffff8047604a>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x2a/0x50
[ 5346.421618] [<ffffffff8023fd46>] do_group_exit+0x36/0xa0
[ 5346.421626] [<ffffffff8020b7cb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Here is a possible fix, introducing get_task_mm_task_locked().
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/cgroup.c | 2 +-
kernel/fork.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
mm/memrlimitcgroup.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index cd67fac..954057c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1773,6 +1773,7 @@ static inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct * mm)
/* mmput gets rid of the mappings and all user-space */
extern void mmput(struct mm_struct *);
/* Grab a reference to a task's mm, if it is not already going away */
+extern struct mm_struct *get_task_mm_task_locked(struct task_struct *task);
extern struct mm_struct *get_task_mm(struct task_struct *task);
/* Remove the current tasks stale references to the old mm_struct */
extern void mm_release(struct task_struct *, struct mm_struct *);
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 678a680..30b9c3a 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2757,7 +2757,7 @@ void cgroup_fork_callbacks(struct task_struct *child)
* invoke this routine, since it assigns the mm->owner the first time
* and does not change it.
*
- * The callbacks are invoked with mmap_sem held in read mode.
+ * The callbacks are invoked with mmap_sem and task_lock held in read mode.
*/
void cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks(struct task_struct *old, struct task_struct *new)
{
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 7b34bc5..24f9656 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -494,6 +494,20 @@ void mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmput);
/**
+ * Must be called with task_lock held.
+ */
+struct mm_struct *get_task_mm_task_locked(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *mm = task->mm;
+
+ if ((!mm) || (task->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ return NULL;
+ atomic_inc(&mm->mm_users);
+ return mm;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_task_mm_task_locked);
+
+/**
* get_task_mm - acquire a reference to the task's mm
*
* Returns %NULL if the task has no mm. Checks PF_KTHREAD (meaning
@@ -507,13 +521,7 @@ struct mm_struct *get_task_mm(struct task_struct *task)
struct mm_struct *mm;
task_lock(task);
- mm = task->mm;
- if (mm) {
- if (task->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
- mm = NULL;
- else
- atomic_inc(&mm->mm_users);
- }
+ mm = get_task_mm_task_locked(task);
task_unlock(task);
return mm;
}
diff --git a/mm/memrlimitcgroup.c b/mm/memrlimitcgroup.c
index 8ee74f6..dad0163 100644
--- a/mm/memrlimitcgroup.c
+++ b/mm/memrlimitcgroup.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ out:
}
/*
- * This callback is called with mmap_sem held
+ * This callback is called with mmap_sem and task_lock held
*/
static void memrlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
struct cgroup *old_cgrp,
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void memrlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
struct task_struct *p)
{
struct memrlimit_cgroup *memrcg, *old_memrcg;
- struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(p);
+ struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm_task_locked(p);
BUG_ON(!mm);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists