lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D29485.5010900@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:48:53 +0200
From:	Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
To:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -mm] memrlimit: fix task_lock() recursive locking

cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks() can be called with task_lock() held in
mm_update_next_owner(), and all the .mm_owner_changed callbacks seem to
be *always* called with task_lock() held.

Actually, memrlimit is using task_lock() via get_task_mm() in
memrlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed(), raising the following recursive locking
trace:

[ 5346.421365] =============================================
[ 5346.421374] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 5346.421381] 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 #20
[ 5346.421385] ---------------------------------------------
[ 5346.421391] interbench/10530 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 5346.421396]  (&p->alloc_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8023b034>] get_task_mm+0x24/0x70
[ 5346.421417]
[ 5346.421418] but task is already holding lock:
[ 5346.421423]  (&p->alloc_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8023db98>] mm_update_next_owner+0x148/0x230
[ 5346.421438]
[ 5346.421440] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 5346.421446] 2 locks held by interbench/10530:
[ 5346.421450]  #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<ffffffff8023db90>] mm_update_next_owner+0x140/0x230
[ 5346.421467]  #1:  (&p->alloc_lock){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8023db98>] mm_update_next_owner+0x148/0x230
[ 5346.421483]
[ 5346.421485] stack backtrace:
[ 5346.421491] Pid: 10530, comm: interbench Not tainted 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 #20
[ 5346.421496] Call Trace:
[ 5346.421507]  [<ffffffff80263383>] validate_chain+0xb03/0x10d0
[ 5346.421515]  [<ffffffff80263c05>] __lock_acquire+0x2b5/0x9c0
[ 5346.421522]  [<ffffffff80262cc2>] validate_chain+0x442/0x10d0
[ 5346.421530]  [<ffffffff802643aa>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xe0
[ 5346.421537]  [<ffffffff8023b034>] get_task_mm+0x24/0x70
[ 5346.421546]  [<ffffffff804757c7>] _spin_lock+0x37/0x70
[ 5346.421553]  [<ffffffff8023b034>] get_task_mm+0x24/0x70
[ 5346.421560]  [<ffffffff8023b034>] get_task_mm+0x24/0x70
[ 5346.421569]  [<ffffffff802b91f8>] memrlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed+0x18/0x90
[ 5346.421579]  [<ffffffff80278b03>] cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks+0x93/0xc0
[ 5346.421587]  [<ffffffff8023dc36>] mm_update_next_owner+0x1e6/0x230
[ 5346.421595]  [<ffffffff8023dd72>] exit_mm+0xf2/0x120
[ 5346.421602]  [<ffffffff8023f547>] do_exit+0x167/0x930
[ 5346.421610]  [<ffffffff8047604a>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x2a/0x50
[ 5346.421618]  [<ffffffff8023fd46>] do_group_exit+0x36/0xa0
[ 5346.421626]  [<ffffffff8020b7cb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Here is a possible fix, introducing get_task_mm_task_locked().

Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    1 +
 kernel/cgroup.c       |    2 +-
 kernel/fork.c         |   22 +++++++++++++++-------
 mm/memrlimitcgroup.c  |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index cd67fac..954057c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1773,6 +1773,7 @@ static inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct * mm)
 /* mmput gets rid of the mappings and all user-space */
 extern void mmput(struct mm_struct *);
 /* Grab a reference to a task's mm, if it is not already going away */
+extern struct mm_struct *get_task_mm_task_locked(struct task_struct *task);
 extern struct mm_struct *get_task_mm(struct task_struct *task);
 /* Remove the current tasks stale references to the old mm_struct */
 extern void mm_release(struct task_struct *, struct mm_struct *);
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 678a680..30b9c3a 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2757,7 +2757,7 @@ void cgroup_fork_callbacks(struct task_struct *child)
  * invoke this routine, since it assigns the mm->owner the first time
  * and does not change it.
  *
- * The callbacks are invoked with mmap_sem held in read mode.
+ * The callbacks are invoked with mmap_sem and task_lock held in read mode.
  */
 void cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks(struct task_struct *old, struct task_struct *new)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 7b34bc5..24f9656 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -494,6 +494,20 @@ void mmput(struct mm_struct *mm)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmput);
 
 /**
+ * Must be called with task_lock held.
+ */
+struct mm_struct *get_task_mm_task_locked(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	struct mm_struct *mm = task->mm;
+
+	if ((!mm) || (task->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+		return NULL;
+	atomic_inc(&mm->mm_users);
+	return mm;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_task_mm_task_locked);
+
+/**
  * get_task_mm - acquire a reference to the task's mm
  *
  * Returns %NULL if the task has no mm.  Checks PF_KTHREAD (meaning
@@ -507,13 +521,7 @@ struct mm_struct *get_task_mm(struct task_struct *task)
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 
 	task_lock(task);
-	mm = task->mm;
-	if (mm) {
-		if (task->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
-			mm = NULL;
-		else
-			atomic_inc(&mm->mm_users);
-	}
+	mm = get_task_mm_task_locked(task);
 	task_unlock(task);
 	return mm;
 }
diff --git a/mm/memrlimitcgroup.c b/mm/memrlimitcgroup.c
index 8ee74f6..dad0163 100644
--- a/mm/memrlimitcgroup.c
+++ b/mm/memrlimitcgroup.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ out:
 }
 
 /*
- * This callback is called with mmap_sem held
+ * This callback is called with mmap_sem and task_lock held
  */
 static void memrlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
 						struct cgroup *old_cgrp,
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void memrlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
 						struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct memrlimit_cgroup *memrcg, *old_memrcg;
-	struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(p);
+	struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm_task_locked(p);
 
 	BUG_ON(!mm);
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ