[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262360809181449v1050c1f7ndf17dadba9fac0bf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 06:49:41 +0900
From: "MinChan Kim" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Martin Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>,
"Chris Snook" <csnook@...hat.com>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
"Hugh Dickens" <hugh@...itas.com>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Avi Kivity" <avi@...ranet.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Populating multiple ptes at fault time
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Christoph Lameter
<cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Martin Bligh wrote:
>
>>> Well, I guess we need a new binary format that allows one to execute binaries
>>> in kernel address space with full powers.
>>
>> Seems ... extreme ;-)
>
> Well yes ....
>
>> Maybe we just do it if we're in readahead? (or similar)
>
> If we are in kernel space then the binary can call the readahead function as
> needed ... ;-O
In case of file-mapped pages, Shouldn't we use just on-demand
readahead mechanism in kernel ?
If it is inefficient, It means we have to change on-demand readahead
mechanism itself.
How about you ?
> Ok, seriously: Anonymous pages are not subject to readahead so it wont work.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Kinds regards,
MinChan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists