[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080920191928.50ED.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:21:34 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Hugh Dickens <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Populating multiple ptes at fault time
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Thanks, that was exactly what I was hoping to see. I didn't see any
> > definitive statements against the patch set, other than a concern that
> > it could make things worse. Was the upshot that no consensus was
> > reached about how to detect when its beneficial to preallocate anonymous
> > pages?
>
> There were multiple discussions on the subject. The consensus was that it was
> difficult to generalize this and it would only work on special loads. Plus it
> would add some overhead to the general case.
but at that time, x86_64 large server doesn't exist yet.
I think mesurement again is valuable because typical server environment
is changed in these days.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists