linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] set TASK_TRACED before arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:44:07 +0800
From:	"Luming Yu" <luming.yu@...il.com>
To:	"Roland McGrath" <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Petr Tesarik" <ptesarik@...e.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] set TASK_TRACED before arch_ptrace code to fix a race

The another mysterious that I completely don't understand  probably
needs your help.
Why kernels with utrace patch applied on ia64 just work?
Sounds like utrace delivers an extra SIGTRAP comparing with kernel
without utrace code..
Dose it make sense? Hmm.. Sounds like a bug to me..

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
> So is there or is there not any regression (change) in the kernel's behavior?
>
> If you are now just talking about strace's own code, then the place for
> that is strace-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, not any kernel lists.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/