[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080918.151326.98179387.taka@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:13:26 +0900 (JST)
From: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@...inux.co.jp>
To: kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, hugh@...itas.com,
menage@...gle.com, xemul@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page (v3)
Hello,
> > But I think each memory model type should have its own way of managing
> > its page_cgroup arrays as doing for its struct page arrays.
> > It would be better rather than the sparsemem approach he said.
> >
> My patch adds an interface. Then...
> FLATMEM support will be very easy.
Yes, that is true, it is really easy.
> I'll ignore DISCONTIGMEM and SPARSEMEM (they will use my 'hash')
What part of this do you think is the problem to implement it in the
straight way for this model?
I think it won't be difficult to implement it since each pgdat can have
its page_cgroup array, which can care about holes in the node as well as
doing it for its struct page array.
> SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP support will took some amount of time. It will need
> per-arch patches.
Yes, each of ia64, powerpc and x86_64 use this memory model.
We should also care about the regular SPARSEMEM case as you mentioned.
> Thanks,
> -Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists