[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080919110645.GO28615@gandalf.research.nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:06:45 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
To: ext Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"George G. Davis" <gdavis@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] watchdog: move omap_wdt.h to include/linux/watchdog
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:56:27AM +0100, ext Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:32:38 +0300
> Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com> wrote:
>
> > Create a new include/linux/watchdog directory
> > for holding watchdog chips headers, move omap_wdt.h
> > to the new location and update the include path in
> > the driver source.
>
> Headers that are driver private belong with the driver. In fact in many
> cases they belong *in* the driver C file but that depends how much is
> there.
>
>
>
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_REV (0x00)
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_SYS_CONFIG (0x10)
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_STATUS (0x14)
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_CNTRL (0x24)
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_CRR (0x28)
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_LDR (0x2c)
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_TGR (0x30)
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_WPS (0x34)
> > +#define OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR (0x48)
> > +
> > +/* Using the prescaler, the OMAP watchdog could go for many
> > + * months before firing. These limits work without scaling,
> > + * with the 60 second default assumed by most tools and docs.
> > + */
> > +#define TIMER_MARGIN_MAX (24 * 60 * 60) /* 1 day */
> > +#define TIMER_MARGIN_DEFAULT 60 /* 60 secs */
> > +#define TIMER_MARGIN_MIN 1
> > +
> > +#define PTV 0 /* prescale */
> > +#define GET_WLDR_VAL(secs) (0xffffffff - ((secs) * (32768/(1<<PTV))) + 1)
> > +
> > +#endif /* _OMAP_WATCHDOG_H */
>
> You could just drop these into the C file given how small they are.
Sure, I'll update the patch. But if you look at patch 5/5, I'll need the
structures to define the set_clock() function. Should I create then
under <mach/omap_wdt.h> ??
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists