[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1221846303.8077.27.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:45:03 -0700
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Hugh Dickens <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Populating multiple ptes at fault time
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:02 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Minor faults are easier; if the page already exists in memory, we should
> > just create mappings to it. If neighbouring pages are also already
> > present, then we can can cheaply create mappings for them too.
> >
> >
>
> One problem is the accessed bit. If it's unset, the shadow code cannot
> make the pte present (since it has to trap in order to set the accessed
> bit); if it's set, we're lying to the vm.
>
> This doesn't affect Xen, only kvm.
Other archs too. On powerpc, !accessed -> not hashed (or not in the TLB
for SW loaded TLB platforms).
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists