lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080919225129.GD9675@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:51:29 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Felipe Balbi <me@...ipebalbi.com>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"George G. Davis" <gdavis@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] watchdog: introduce platform_data and remove cpu conditional code

On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:33:34AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Well, patches 4 and 5 should be ignored. Should I resend or could I rely
> on the fact that people won't pick them up ?

Given my comments on patch 1, it's probably a good idea to resend
just 1 to 3.  We can then talk about 4 and 5 some more.

Wim - can you let me know when you merge the followup patches into your
tree please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ