[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080919062946.GH27426@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:29:46 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: joerg.roedel@....com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/23] AMD IOMMU: implement lazy IO/TLB flushing
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:10:32AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:03:50 +0200
> Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:29:24AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:28:27 +0200
> > > Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 04:20:18AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:52:37 +0200
> > > > > Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The IO/TLB flushing on every unmaping operation is the most expensive
> > > > > > part there and not strictly necessary. It is sufficient to do the flush
> > > > > > before any entries are reused. This is patch implements lazy IO/TLB
> > > > > > flushing which does exactly this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +++++
> > > > > > arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > > > arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu_init.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > > > > > include/asm-x86/amd_iommu_types.h | 9 +++++++++
> > > > > > 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > > index c2e00ee..5f0aefe 100644
> > > > > > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > > @@ -284,6 +284,11 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
> > > > > > isolate - enable device isolation (each device, as far
> > > > > > as possible, will get its own protection
> > > > > > domain)
> > > > > > + unmap_flush - enable flushing of IO/TLB entries when
> > > > > > + they are unmapped. Otherwise they are
> > > > > > + flushed before they will be reused, which
> > > > > > + is a lot of faster
> > > > > > +
> > > > >
> > > > > Would it be nice to have consistency of IOMMU parameters?
> > > >
> > > > True. We should merge common parameters across IOMMUs into the
> > > > iommu= parameter some time in the future, I think. It would also be the
> > > > place for the IOMMU size parameter.
> > >
> > > Hmm, now is better than the future? I think that now you can add
> > > something like 'disable_batching_flush' as a common parameter and
> > > change AMD IOMMU to use it.
> >
> > Ok, I queued the following patch in the AMD IOMMU updates and changed
> > this patch to use iommu_fullflush instead. Is this patch ok? It changes
> > the behavior of GART to use lazy flushing by default. But I don't think
> > that this is a problem.
> >
> > commit 9769771290fddcfc0362c5d30242151d4eb1cc46
> > Author: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> > Date: Thu Sep 18 15:23:43 2008 +0200
> >
> > x86: move GART TLB flushing options to generic code
> >
> > The GART currently implements the iommu=[no]fullflush command line
> > parameters which influence its IO/TLB flushing strategy. This patch
> > makes these parameters generic so that they can be used by the AMD IOMMU
> > too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index c2e00ee..569527e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -888,6 +888,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
> > nomerge
> > forcesac
> > soft
> > + fullflush
> > + Flush IO/TLB at every deallocation
> > + nofullflush
> > + Flush IO/TLB only when addresses are reused (default)
>
> I'm not sure about making 'nofullflush' a generic option. Enabling
> nofullflush option doesn't change anything. So what's the point of the
> option?
Backwards compatability with the GART code. These two options are
basically just moved from the GART code to pci-dma.c. But otherwise its
pointless, I can remove it if everybody else agrees.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists