[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080919074034.GA8945@strlen.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:40:34 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...len.de>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UIO: Resend: Change driver name of uio_pdrv
Hello Hans,
[Added Magnus Damm (= author of uio_pdrv_genirq) to Cc:]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:03:07PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> The patch below was already discussed and accepted:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/7/409
>
> It somehow got lost (probably because I forgot it when I sent my queue
> to Greg...). So, here it is again:
>
> -------------8<------------------------
>
> The generic UIO platform device driver should be given a unique driver ID and
> not just "uio". This is especially important since we now have a similar driver
> named uio_pdrv_genirq. Currently, there's no user of this driver in the
> mainline kernel.
I want to suggest to rename uio_pdrv_genirq to uio_genirq instead. In
my eyes this would be more clear. IMHO the pdrv suffix doesn't yield
more clearity because it is only used in a certain namespace---namely
that of platform devices. So e.g.
/sys/bus/platform/devices/uio_pdrv.0
isn't any better than
/sys/bus/platform/devices/uio.0
. Looking at the name of other platform drivers using
git grep -E '_pdrv(_.*)?"'
I get three false positives[1] and uio_pdrv_genirq (driver and some
users in arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/setup-sh7343.c). So the _pdrv suffix
doesn't seem very common.
Just my 0.02€
Best regards
Uwe
[1] in drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists