[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D36794.6010002@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:49:24 +0900
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, fernando@....ntt.co.jp,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@...nvz.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, agk@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: dm-ioband + bio-cgroup benchmarks
Hi Tsuruta-san,
Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have got excellent results of dm-ioband, that controls the disk I/O
> bandwidth even when it accepts delayed write requests.
>
> In this time, I ran some benchmarks with a high-end storage. The
> reason was to avoid a performance bottleneck due to mechanical factors
> such as seek time.
>
> You can see the details of the benchmarks at:
> http://people.valinux.co.jp/~ryov/dm-ioband/hps/
>
I took a look at your beautiful results!
When you have time, would you explain me how you succeeded to check the
time, bandwidth, especially when you did write() tests? Actually, I tried
similar tests and failed to check the bandwidth correctly. Did you insert
something in the kernel source?
Thanks,
Takuya Yoshikawa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists