[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809200955360.12824@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 09:59:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
astarikovskiy@...e.de
Subject: Re: Reading EeePC900 battery info causes stalls (was Re: How how
latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?)
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
>
> > I thought we had a wakeup latency tracer exacty like we have preempt and
> > irq off latency tracers, Steve, where'd that go?
>
> I rebuilt my kernel after a make clean and wakeup was still not there. It
> might be a good idea to modify the kernel documentation currently
> provided with 2.6.27 if it has gone away for now (or document the extra
> switches needed to turn it on if that's why it didn't show up for me)...
The wake up tracing is CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER. If you do not see
"wakeup" as one of the available tracers in available_tracers, then check
your dmesg and see if you have CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST enabled. There
was a known bug that would cause the wakeup tracing to fail the test. When
a trace fails the startup test, it is disabled.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists