| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080921140203.4698a2ee@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:02:03 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhu@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com, jgarzik@...ox.com, linville@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart. On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:57:06 +0400 Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> wrote: > > > Consider for inclusing for the upcoming kernel to get wider > > > notifications. Yes, it is not a bugfix, I know. > > > > still more complex than needed; a WARN_ON_ONCE() will be enough. > > That allows to dump whatever number of warnings you want. The more we > have, the louder will be customers scream. artificially increasing numbers isn't going to do that; it just shows you're more interested in making a stink than in getting something improved ;( > -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists