linux-kernel - Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200809211936.00414.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date:	Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:36:00 +0200
From:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhu@...el.com,
	reinette.chatre@...el.com, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	linville@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.

On Sunday 21 September 2008 19:23:17 Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Following bug exists in the ipw2100 driver/firmware for years and Intel
> folks never responded to zillions bugzilla entries and forum notices in
> the internet with some patch or firmware update (although did request
> dmesg and debug info, and received them).
> 
> ipw2100: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.
> 
> I believe it is a firmware bug because after driver is unloaded and
> loaded back again wireless adapter usually starts working (for small
> amount of time though). My conspiracy feeling can suggest, that it may
> be kind of a force to buy a new one, or trivial error in the firmware,
> when it writes to the same place in the flash and essentially given cell
> became dead or whatever else.
> 
> Intel folks, please fix this problem, I see no other way to force you to do
> this than to mark ipw2100 driver as broken, since that is what it is.

You are pretty funny, actually. :)

I think the bug should be fixed, but what makes _you_ think you can _force_
anybody to do so?

> Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig
> index 9931b5a..c24fc6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ config PCMCIA_RAYCS
>  
>  config IPW2100
>  	tristate "Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Connection"
> -	depends on PCI && WLAN_80211
> +	depends on PCI && WLAN_80211 && BROKEN
>  	select WIRELESS_EXT
>  	select FW_LOADER
>  	select IEEE80211
> 



-- 
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/