[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080922105956.GA16069@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 06:59:56 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Takashi Sato <t-sato@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"mtk.manpages@...glemail.com" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/10] VFS: Fix error handling of
write_super_lockfs/unlockfs
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 07:55:26PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
> I've changed the type of write_super_lockfs and unlockfs from "void" to
> "int" so that they can return an error.
Returning an error from the freeze operation makes sense, but for the
unfreeze I don't see the point. You must however change all existing
instances to actually return a value (even if it's always 0 for now)
to avoid breaking git bisect.
If you touch all instances anyway, it would be nice to rename them
to freeze / unfreze as the current names are more confusing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists