[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D7B5F8.9020300@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:12:56 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Alan Mayer <ajm@....com>, jeremy@...p.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.lu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] switch vector_irq[] from irq number to irq_desc pointer
v2
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> Note that my recent patch from a couple of weeks ago, stripped almost
>> all of the cpumask_t's from the io_apic functions. Any chance we can
>> apply them before we add more?
>>
>> I'd be willing to merge in Dean's patch over the top of mine (or
>> vice-versa).
>
> i'm really looking forwards to Rusty's 'get-rid-of-cpumask_t use'
> patchset, which would solve such cpumask_t proliferation issues once and
> for all.
>
> Ingo
Hi Ingo,
The net effect of the "getting rid of cpumask_t's" will be the same. This
patch reduces considerably the amount of stack space being required right
now. The new cpumask_t approach will take quite a bit of time to get it
"up and running". (It took me about a day to get init/main.c and kernel/sched.c
to just compile... it now needs the temp cpumasks to actually function. And
there are a number of areas that will need to be altered before functional
testing can start.)
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists