[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809221729.06870.ms@teamix.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:29:06 +0200
From: Martin Steigerwald <ms@...mix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: documentation about scheduling policies
Please CC to me as I am not subscribed to linux-kernel.
Hi!
I wonder about scheduling policies in CFS. I find these:
ms@...go> grep "case SCHED_" sched.c sched_fair.c | sort | uniq
~/lokal/Kernel/linux-2.6.26/kernel
sched.c: case SCHED_BATCH:
sched.c: case SCHED_FIFO:
sched.c: case SCHED_IDLE:
sched.c: case SCHED_NORMAL:
sched.c: case SCHED_RR:
sched_fair.c seems to differentiate SCHED_PATCH only:
ms@...go> egrep "(SCHED_I|SCHED_B)" sched_fair.c
~/lokal/Kernel/linux-2.6.26/kernel
* Completely Fair Scheduling (CFS) Class (SCHED_NORMAL/SCHED_BATCH)
if (likely(!sysctl_sched_compat_yield) && curr->policy != SCHED_BATCH)
{
if (unlikely(p->policy == SCHED_BATCH))
The documentation on scheduling policies in Documentation/scheduler appears
rather scarse to me.
The wikipage at
http://ck.wikia.com/wiki/SchedulingPolicies
has more hints. But I wonder whether they are up to date and also they partly
related to RSDL/SD features.
What about SCHED_IDLEPRIO anyway - the description of it makes it appear quite
useful to me? Is it SCHED_IDLE in the new scheduler? Hmm, it does not appear
that chrt can set this scheduling priority as of util-linux-ng 2.13.1.1.
I am willing to create documentation patches provided someone explains these
to me ;-).
Ciao,
--
Martin Steigerwald - team(ix) GmbH - http://www.teamix.de
gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists