[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080922162314.GC24392@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:23:14 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove fullflush and nofullflush in IOMMU generic option
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:25:24AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> I'm not sure we can because he has a quite different opinion on this,
> he thinks that the IOMMU parameters are unimportant and minor issue.
>
Stop your personal attacks and come down. I've never said that iommu
parameters are unimportant. The _move_ of the iommu=[no]fullflush to
generic code is a minor issue in my opinion. For the user it changes
nothing. There was an iommu=fullflush parameter before and now there is
also an iommu=fullflush parameter. The only difference is that it now
affects AMD IOMMU too.
> I'm against adding new generic IOMMU parameters without serious
> consideration. Joerg thinks that we can clean up the parameters like
> adding some for 2.6.28, then add some for 2.6.X, then rename some, in
> an ad-hoc way.
Again. Stop your personal attacks.
Joerg
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists