lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080922175803.GK16840@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:58:09 -0400
From:	Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dzickus@...hat.com,
	prarit@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NMI watchdog: when booting with reset_devices, clear
	the performance counters

> > P4s have a quirk that makes necessary to clear P4_CCCR_OVF bit on the CCCR
> > everytime the PMI is triggered. When booting the kernel with reset_devices
> > (more specific kdump case), the counters reach zero and the PMI will be
> > generated. This is not a problem on other processors but on P4s, it'll
> > continue to generate NMIs until that bit is cleared. Since there may be
> > other users of the performance counters, clear and disable all of them
> > when booting with reset_devices option.
> > 
> > We have a P4 box here that crashes because of this problem. Since the kdump
> > kernel usually boots with only one processor active, the second logical
> > unit won't be set up, therefore, MSR_P4_IQ_CCCR1 (and other performance
> > counter registers) won't be cleared and P4_CCCR_OVF may be still set because
> > the previous kernel was using this register. An NMI is triggered because of
> > the MSR_P4_IQ_CCCR1 right after the NMI delivery is enabled, triggering the
> > race fixed on my previous email.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> 
> applied to tip/x86/nmi-watchdog, thanks.
> 
> i'm wondering, is this fix a v2.6.27 candidate?
I believe so. Even being a small affected group (P4 based boxes using NMI
watchdog and kdump), it's fully reproducible.

-- 
Aristeu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ