[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809221059.54779.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:59:54 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export kmap_atomic_pfn for DRM-GEM.
On Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:22 pm Nick Piggin wrote:
> > However, when other DRM drivers get around to doing memory management,
> > I'm sure they'll also be interested in an ioremap_wc that doesn't eat
> > ipi costs. For us, the ipis for flushing were eating over 10% of CPU
> > time. If your patch series cuts that cost, we could drop this piece at
> > that point.
>
> It can cut the cost quite significantly on normal vmap/vunmap loads I
> tested. Whether it will work as well on your workload, I don't know
> but I would have liked to find out. I raised this issue quite a while
> back, so I'm disappointed it had not been tried...
I think Eric has code with the vmap changes now?
Given our discussions at KS/Plumbers would you be ok with acking these
patches? Or do you want a repost so you can check out the vmap stuff?
After talking a bit more about it, I think we agreed that the ioctl interface
is actually a better approach then trying to shoehorn this stuff into system
calls, so aside from the vmap code (which could be done in 2.6.29 or whenever
the vmap stuff lands) I think this patchset is pretty close to what we want
in drm-next now...
Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists